Evaluate viability of switching to Docker #14
Labels
No Label
Blocked
Duplicate
In-progress
On-hold
Peer-review
RFC
Wontfix
Blocked
Duplicate
In-progress
On-hold
Peer-review
RFC
Wontfix
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: AniNIX/Wiki#14
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
We previously had tried to replace our current 2x1U SuperMicro X8 ecosystem with a QEMU+GlusterFS cluster of 5 RaspberryPi 4's. That didn't scale enough to even boot the ArchLinux ISO.
However, a new video from Network Chuck shows using Rancher to orchestrate a Kubernetes cluster. Some of our applications may work well in a Docker environment, like TT-RSS, Gitea, etc. Some may be able to work natively on a Pi, like Emby or SFTP.
Others, though, need some more evaluation. Pipelines like Sharingan and WolfPack are complex and load intensive on their current frames. We'd also need to evaluate the syslog-ng ingest layer we'd have to add on top of our containers to make sure data is being pulled in correctly.
At the moment, this is on pause as Ubiqtorate still needs to finish going live and we need to focus on getting our cybersecurity services more ingestible for demos. We may look at a targeted migration of apps for a partial roll-out at some point. Starting this thread to record conversation and ideas.
Services with available docker images:
Service we need to compose Docker images for:
Notes:
If we go this route, as part of using Ubiqtorate#17 as a POC, we should look into the k8s learning materials at https://github.com/openshift-homeroom.
We should also look at resurrecting our Folding@Home charity arm with https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/foldingathome.